All of what’s proposed here, much like incentives to relocate families or Kyoto’s tourism problem, don’t look at underlying structural issues, the root cause, which, of course, is complex but boils down to the unfortunate fact that most rural areas have created for themselves by way of the status quo or have had created for them an image…
All of what’s proposed here, much like incentives to relocate families or Kyoto’s tourism problem, don’t look at underlying structural issues, the root cause, which, of course, is complex but boils down to the unfortunate fact that most rural areas have created for themselves by way of the status quo or have had created for them an image of patheticness, a an endlessly repeating spiral of self-defeat.
That’s not what some places actually are, but after so many years of convincing themselves of their podunk-ness, they’ve become rather podunk, assumed that role, and with that comes the whittling away of resources, doctors included. Like any tailspin, it’s hard to come back from - and some, probably many, won’t.
As much as I love Tohoku - I lived in Miyako on the coast of Iwate from 2009-2011, got wrecked by the tsunami there, still have very strong ties - its situation is mostly too far gone to make good use of the resources Japan is able to muster right now to address the issue.
As I do with akiya, there are easy wins, lost causes, and everything in between. What must be done in the short term to affect a more positive long term is to tactically determine those easy wins and achieve them one by one.
Thank you for reading and thinking about this situation, especially from your perspective of living in a part of Tohoku devastated by 3-11.
While I agree that there are many places that are already too far gone, there are several bright spots scattered throughout the countryside. As I argued in the article, much of this particular problem is rooted in the artificial restrictions placed on the delivery of medical care in Japan by doctors. If more nurse practitioners, for example, were empowered to do more on their own, then large swaths of the rural population would likely receive far better care.
I take your point that many rural areas seem to be poorly managed by people whose attitude seems to be "woe is me"; there are enthusiastic advocates for positive change who need to be nurtured. If physician organizations were more realistic about how to deliver health care effectively in rural areas, and more willing to relinquish some control, the rural-urban divide might not be so great.
All of what’s proposed here, much like incentives to relocate families or Kyoto’s tourism problem, don’t look at underlying structural issues, the root cause, which, of course, is complex but boils down to the unfortunate fact that most rural areas have created for themselves by way of the status quo or have had created for them an image of patheticness, a an endlessly repeating spiral of self-defeat.
That’s not what some places actually are, but after so many years of convincing themselves of their podunk-ness, they’ve become rather podunk, assumed that role, and with that comes the whittling away of resources, doctors included. Like any tailspin, it’s hard to come back from - and some, probably many, won’t.
As much as I love Tohoku - I lived in Miyako on the coast of Iwate from 2009-2011, got wrecked by the tsunami there, still have very strong ties - its situation is mostly too far gone to make good use of the resources Japan is able to muster right now to address the issue.
As I do with akiya, there are easy wins, lost causes, and everything in between. What must be done in the short term to affect a more positive long term is to tactically determine those easy wins and achieve them one by one.
Thank you for reading and thinking about this situation, especially from your perspective of living in a part of Tohoku devastated by 3-11.
While I agree that there are many places that are already too far gone, there are several bright spots scattered throughout the countryside. As I argued in the article, much of this particular problem is rooted in the artificial restrictions placed on the delivery of medical care in Japan by doctors. If more nurse practitioners, for example, were empowered to do more on their own, then large swaths of the rural population would likely receive far better care.
I take your point that many rural areas seem to be poorly managed by people whose attitude seems to be "woe is me"; there are enthusiastic advocates for positive change who need to be nurtured. If physician organizations were more realistic about how to deliver health care effectively in rural areas, and more willing to relinquish some control, the rural-urban divide might not be so great.